June 24, 2008

Out & About: 481-year-old Jakarta still a teenager

By Adisti Sukma Sawitri

How long does it take for the average person to reach maturity and take control of his or her life? Talking biologically, it may takes at least 20 years, or until a secure job of their own is in the bag.

Life is still in the making when you are in your teens. This is the time when acne is despised, as well as the day a boy's voice breaks.

It's also a time when girls get their first period and feel anxious about their changing bodies, as they avoid mirrors at all costs.

And suddenly, life gets harder than it used to be. After a string of failed romances at schools and maybe several brawls with other students, these boys and girls find themselves looking for lives more suitable for themselves.

Securing a job gives them direction and the next step is to start a family and continue the circle of life.

It is a different story for cities. Things take much longer to grow. How long does it take for a city to reach its maturity and be able to offer a nice and comfortable life for its citizens?

For Jakarta, 481 years has seemingly not been long enough to get things going. The city still does not offer a decent standard of living for its citizens.

Almost five centuries old, Jakarta is hardly able to provide any sort of decent livelihood for people living on the riverbanks.

They generally no longer bathe in the river as many did hundreds of years ago; it has become unbearably murky. Still, these people practice good sanitation to improve their lives by the river.

The city remains a trading hub for people from all over the world. Trade here has brought the city the lights and colors of other cities around the world.

But these imported spectacles are not enough to make the city as attractive as it once was. Hundreds of years ago, the Chinese, Europeans and Arabs competed to live in the city. Nowadays, the city attracts few foreigners. People from other provinces come here only to try and make it in the big smoke. Less than five percent of the city's 8.5 million population are foreigners.

The main obstacle for the city is one of values. Citizens and their governments pay more attention to the bling bling of the city, like high-rises or whether or not the city has malls, rather than basic facilities to keep it functioning.

The city has yet to update its drainage system, which further deteriorates each time the city is flooded.

The busway, established on disagreements and poor planning, is the most sophisticated development we have seen in public transportation after the Dutch established the railway for the first time in 1871.

Other public transportation is just as unsatisfactory and crowded as it was in several decades ago.

Having too many immigrants, from inside or outside the country, is no excuse for the administration's inability to develop the city.

The city has been a city of immigrants since the day its founder, Fatahillah, a king from Demak, won the small harbor city back from Portugal and changed its name from Sunda Kelapa to Jayakarta on June 22, 1527.

Some think the 400-year-old city is still young. But what about Singapore, which began as a British trading post in 1819 or Bangkok, established as Thailand's capital in 1782?

While these two cities developed subway systems decades ago, we are only starting to construct one, while still attempting to develop a monorail for the city.

In the end, it is likely the people will change before the system or the city does.

They will probably change their holiday destinations from Bogor and Bandung to the more developed Singapore or Shanghai.

Even if these things change, hypocrisy and unfairness remains on all levels of society.

Think about how long the administration has treated squatters as non-existent beings in the city. Think about the people who still believe in the "trickle-down" effect, where prosperity is supposedly automatically distributed to all, as opposed to implementing proper systems in the city.

Think about how we have denied the Ahmadiyah sect and other religious groups from practicing their faiths.

Looking back to the Monas attack, I hardly think Jakartans, whether Betawi or not, are going to make a greater leap towards prosperity than we already have.

Members of Islamic Defendant Front (FPI) and the Alliance for Freedom of Faith and Religion are not willing to make room for their differences.

The FPI and the alliance have made a statement through their actions that their differences will be settled physically, as both sides fight with their eyes shut.

The state also keeps its eyes shut, meaning we need to live with unfinished business while pretending that we have moved on.

Once again, all of us pretend we have no problems at all, rather than trying to solve them. [The Jakarta Post]

Tags: ,
Permalink • Print • Comment

May 23, 2008

City won't switch off billboard lights for power saving program

By Adisti Sukma Sawitri and Mustaqim Adamrah

The Jakarta administration will not support state-owned power operator PT PLN's plan to turn off billboard lights on Jl. Sudirman and Jl. Thamrin in South and Central Jakarta because they contribute significant income to the city, an official says.

Deputy head of the Jakarta Revenue Agency, Rachmat Achyar, said the operator's plan would discourage companies from advertising on those streets.

"We've never studied the significance of lighting on the attractiveness of a billboard, but logically, companies will experience a loss if people cannot see their ads at night," he said.

Rachmat said companies might not be willing to renew their contracts with the administration after their current ones expired.

He said billboards on the two streets contributed significantly to the city's revenue, as they yielded Rp 15,000 (US$1.60) per square meter per day; the highest rates in the city.

Rachmat said the administration's policy to take down several cigarette company billboards on the streets cost the city about Rp 10 billion in tax revenue last year.

PLN has been campaigning to reduce power consumption in the country in the wake of increasing fuel prices and subsequent increasing production costs. One of their policies is to encourage business districts in high power consuming cities like Jakarta to start cutting usage.

Secretary-general of the Indonesian Advertising Company Association, Irfan Ramli, said if the power company implemented the policy, it should not only apply to their billboards.

"I believe we and our clients are ready to support the policy, but PLN must assure all office buildings, restaurants and entertainment venues do the same thing," he said.

Previously, PLN suggested shopping mall operators cut one operational hour to save energy. The association of mall operators voiced their objections to the plan, saying the measure would considerably hurt their income.

Head of public relations for PLN's Jakarta and Tangerang branch, Azwar Lubis, said the operator did not plan to get tough on the policy.

He said PLN understood it would not be easy to implement the energy-saving program without reducing the productivity of business players.

"Our goal is to raise the awareness of our customers that it is important to start saving energy," said Anwar.

He said the operator was also ready to provide personnel to assist building management to use power more efficiently. Anwar said the operator targeted business districts because industries and households had their own energy-saving programs.

The operator has already applied consumption restrictions to industries and high power consuming residential areas.

City secretary Muhayat said Monday the administration was yet to be informed on the power-saving program.

"We'll discuss that in a meeting soon where we will decide whether an evaluation of targeted tax revenue is necessary in response to PLN's plan," he said.

Power consumption profile of Jakarta and Tangerang from January to March 2008 (in gigawatt hours)

Industry 2,188
Business 2,057
Housing 2,368
Public and government 289
Social 196

Highest voltage burden: 4,140 megawatts in daylight and 3,929 megawatts in the evening PLN's national target for power-saving program: Each consumer should reduce consumption by 20 percent

Source: PLN Jakarta and Tangerang. (The Jakarta Post)

Tags: , ,
Permalink • Print • Comment

March 1, 2008

City caricatures come easy: Cartoonists

Adisti Sukma Sawitri, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

A transvestite wearing a rowdy wig, gaudy makeup and shabby tank top singing a dangdut song in a baritone voice is not something most people want to see while sitting at a traffic light or stuck on a congested street.

It's the sort of thing that makes you want to avert your eyes. You could give her some money, to make her go away, but your car would be besieged by a line of baby-toting beggars who'd like some, too.

These common characters can be easily found on any street in Jakarta, and now they are all wrapped up in a new edition of satirical cartoons, 100 'Tokoh' yang mewarnai Jakarta (100 characters who color Jakarta).

The book marks a return for the Lagak Jakarta (Jakarta Style) series of cartoons, which takes a humorous view of life in the city.

The book, the work of cartoonists Benny Rachmadi and Muhammad Misrad, features 100 characters from daily life in every corner of the city.

From the sweaty "street fighters" who collect coins from motorists to the big-haired rich women who swathe themselves in branded items and paint for pleasure, all are stars in their own lives.

"Everyone is unique and 'a big star' in their own life," Muhammad Misrad, or Mice, told The Jakarta Post on Friday.

Mice said he and Benny did not have to go out of their way to research the characters in the book, because they were such common features wherever you go in the city.

"What we did was just try to put humor and irony in every character, instead of only lamenting their bad luck in life," he said.

The duo started drawing the characters four months ago and ended up with more than 100, saying there were so many interesting people in the city, including the frog catcher who delivers his catch to restaurants and traditional medicine sellers.

They decided to whittle them down to 100 characters, because it is an "even" number and "sounded good" for the title.

Benny said although they loved all of the characters they created, both agreed the most annoying moments were when they tried to draw a public order official or a legislator.

"We don't like those two characters because we don't think they do anything good for people, but again, we try to criticize that in the details we came up with in explaining their outfits," he said.

Benny and Mice produced six volumes of Lagak Jakarta from 1997 to 1999, including volumes on transportation, the lives of Jakartans during the 1998 economic crisis, the beginning of the reform era and the 1999 general election.

They took a long pause before launching this new book, with both involved in graphic design projects.

Tags: ,
Permalink • Print • Comment

February 19, 2008

Economy grows despite obstacles

Adisti Sukma Sawitri, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

Seemingly undeterred by floods and traffic problems, the city's economy grew by 6.4 percent last year.

A total of Rp 332.7 trillion (approximately US$35.8 billion) in regional domestic output was posted.

The trade, hotel and restaurant sector, the transportation and telecommunications sector and the finance, rent and services sector all contributed significantly to the satisfying growth figure.

"Overall, it has been quite a good year for the city as it has maintained its economic activities at a moderate pace," said the head of the Jakarta Statistics Agency, Djamal, during a press conference Friday.

Djamal said the telecommunications industry had become the fastest growing sub-sector, contributing more than half of the total output of Rp 30.5 trillion posted by the transportation and telecommunications sector last year.

"An increase in the number of people who own cellular phones has been the main contributor to growth in the telecommunications sub-sector," said Djamal.

He also said Jakarta's traffic woes were shared by almost all of the city's residents, as evidenced by a decline in growth in the road transportation sub-sector during the last three months of 2007.

The Jakarta administration was aiming for economic growth equal to 6.6 percent in 2007. It continues to maintain that the future economic growth of the city is closely linked to solid transportation infrastructure.

However, as many programs were not realized last year, the administration was not entirely satisfied with the total growth rate recorded.

Economist Aviliani from the Institute for the Development of Economics and Finance said the city's growth rate last year was "good, but could have been better" if the administration had applied tax incentives to foster growth in the manufacturing sector.

With the high costs of transportation due to traffic woes in the city, Aviliani said the administration should have provided tax incentives for manufacturing industry players in the capital.

"In the absence of major transportation development in the city, the administration should provide tax cuts to invite more players into the sector, otherwise it will surely die," she said.

She said as long as the administration did nothing to attract more investors, economic growth would continue to depended on the monetary and financial sectors, which are fragile due to external factors such as global currency trends.

Tags: , ,
Permalink • Print • Comment

January 24, 2008

PT KA red tape: A fork in Jakarta line?

Adisti Sukma Sawitri, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

A split has been planned in the Indonesian National Railway Company (PT KA) since 2000, with its Greater Jakarta Division.

It has long been suggested that the division, which has served an average of 65 percent of the company's annual 160 million passengers, could not be managed properly by a centralized unit and had no power to make its own decisions.

But PT KA has not made much progress at the junction, with several legal and political hurdles on the tracks.

Train observer Taufik Hidayat of Indonesian Railway Watch said the central government was simply not paying enough attention to the Jakarta city train network.

He criticized the government and PT KA for not having any plans to develop the network as the backbone of land transit.

"There has been no long term development goals until now, as if it has no past and future," Taufik said.

Revitalization paths have always been short-term, and project based.

"The plan to split with the Greater Jakarta division has been scheduled since the 1980s but things have hardly changed," he said.

PT KA management's poor capacity had plunged the public service into a shabby condition, Taufik said.

He cited, as an example, that the company had never openly stated its annual expenditure to the public. It had only stated their income but never really explained where all the money was spent, he said.

Taufik said the company received some Rp 450 billion (US$47.4 million) in funding from private firms in Indonesia last year, through the Public Service Obligation (PSO) scheme, but has not explained where that money went.

PT KA spokesman Syaiful Echwan confirmed that the company had received the money but had declined to state it publicly since it was still conducting an audit of last year's accounts.

He also declined to divulge the company's financial statements, saying the company was busy with the audit and budgeting for next year.

Syaiful only mentioned that the total budget for the revitalization of the national train network was Rp 19 trillion.

He said the Greater Jakarta Division would receive a significant portion of the budget since it had the highest profits among other divisions.

"We are still calculating the exact allocation," Taufik said.

Syaiful said PT KA was prepared to support the government's plan to split the division. (JP/Adisti Sukma Sawitri)

 

Tags: , ,
Permalink • Print • Comment

Revitalization plan promises better train service

Adisti Sukma Sawitri, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

Train passengers at Manggarai station in South Jakarta are getting used to uncomfortable waits, with many of them spreading newspapers on the floor to sit out the long gaps between trains.

On Monday afternoon the station wasn't crowded, but the few seats were not enough for the hundreds of commuters awaiting their trains.

Hamdani of Depok Baru, who uses the express train every day, said he was used to standing at platforms as almost no stations in Greater Jakarta were equipped with enough waiting chairs.

On this day he also sat on the platform as the trains were behind schedule.

"I don't mind enduring this hardship, because I'm already used to sitting on the floor in the train, and it is much better than enduring zillions of traffic jams to get to my office," said the employee of a private company in South Jakarta.

It has been love-hate relationship between passengers and the city's train network. As one of the most extensive transit systems linking the city to its neighboring regions, it has been the answer for many residents tired of traffic jams.

But passengers endure glitches in the service.

Delays are frequent and trains not always well-maintained. Some riders have to struggle to get to their trains as most stations in Greater Jakarta are not equipped with sufficient parking space.

"I need to wait for my husband to drop me at the station early in the morning and pick me in the afternoon as there is no parking lot here," said Nina Wahyuni, a researcher at an institute in Menteng, South Jakarta, who travels by the 6 a.m train from Bogor to Sudirman station every day.

The number of passengers on state-owned railway operator PT Kereta Api (PT KA) trains in Greater Jakarta has dropped in recent years as services have scarcely improved despite the increasing fare for all train classes.

From 117 million passengers in 2002, the company was down to 100 million in 2005.

However, as roads gets increasingly congested every year, the central government and the Jakarta administration have renewed their hope in using the network to ease traffic.

A train law passed last year obliges PT KA to split its authority to private firms or local governments to improve services.

The law ordered that after a transition period lasting until 2009, every region could operate its own train service, with PT KA staying on only as the controller of railway network.

The privatization plan has pushed the rail company to make major changes to its networks, and to target raising the number of daily passengers in Greater Jakarta from about 290,000 in 2006, or 1.75 percent of area's 16 million total commuters, to 390,000 by 2010.

It has conducted a series of evictions along the rail tracks to keep trains from delays and accidents.

The company has also increased cars for several routes like Depok-Manggarai as well as revitalized several abandoned lines like the Ciliwung Blue Line that traverses the inner-city.

The inner-city line from Manggarai station to Jatinegara station in East Jakarta last operated in the 1980s. It was closed within a few years as it attracted very few passengers.

The company also plans to redesign the network by making the Manggarai station the central hub for lines from eastern and southern Jakarta, thus avoiding conflicts with the increasing number of train cars operating in Greater Jakarta.

Once the station is reconstructed, no train from southern outskirt of Jakarta will travel directly to Kota station in West Jakarta.

Spokesman for PT KA's Greater Jakarta division Akhmad Sujadi said a lack of attention from the central and local governments was the main reason for the network's problems.

"Road-based transportation has outpaced the train network in the past decades while the Greater Jakarta division was trapped as only a small unit within the company," he told The Jakarta Post.

The division had to make decisions only with the approval of the company's central management, he said, effectively handcuffing efforts to set tracks and improve services for decades.

"Most of the tracks in Greater Jakarta are Dutch-inherited, built for trade activities, so some tracks do not match the commuting patterns today," Akhmad said.

One of the idle tracks links Kota to Tanjung Priok. Several parts of the track were covered by semi-permanent settlements.

Company-built lines include the Depok-Bogor line and the double-track linking Tanah Abang in Central Jakarta to Serpong in Tangerang.

In 2000, the division was given greater autonomy, but its income still goes directly to company headquarters, with the division receiving its budget from the larger unit.

"We are trying so hard to improve our services, but of course it will take a while before we really meet people's expectations," said Akhmad.

Annual passengers and ticket sales of PT KA's Greater Jakarta division

Year Passengers Ticket sales

(in millions) (in billions of rupiah)
2002 117.86 119.26
2003 102.04 156.41
2004 100.39 169.12
2005 100.96 186.51
2006 104.58 205.86

Source: Jakarta In Numbers 2007

 

Tags: , ,
Permalink • Print • Comment

January 2, 2008

Hasty planning puts busway expansion into slow lane

Adisti Sukma Sawitri and Mustaqim Adamrah, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

It has been a roller-coaster year for the administration, campaigning for its Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system.

After gaining various awards and praise for the public transit solution last year, the administration faced public criticism, in the fourth quarter of 2007, over its handling of the busway network expansion, with more main thoroughfares becoming obstructed.

Amid Jakarta's chronic traffic congestion, motorists found a new scapegoat for the problem: the busway and its exclusive lanes.

The resistance became so loud that the administration has decided to stop construction on the network next year.

"Motorists get really angry because they feel they have been forced into sacrificing their roads for a system which does not work, but the busway is still the most modern form of transit available for (Jakarta) passengers," said Rudy Thehamihardja, a transport surveillance officer from the Heritage Foundation (a non-profit organization overseeing transportation development).

The busway network is one of four modes of transport planned under the administration's Macro Transportation Framework.

Established in 2004, the busway was intended to provide an alternative mode of transport for Jakarta citizens. The administration predicted that without significantly increasing its roads, Jakarta would become gridlocked by 2014.

Since other means of public transport including a monorail, subway and water vessels were considered either more expensive or unfeasible, the administration has invested more than Rp 1 trillion on expanding the busway network over the last five years.

Since the construction of the first busway corridor (joining Blok M and Kota) began in 2002 the administration has targeted to complete 15 corridors by 2010.

With rapid network expansion — four new corridors last year and three this year — the administration and its busway management company, Transjakarta, have paid less attention to detail in the quality of service provided.

Among other basic necessities which have slipped past the planning board, the administration and the Transjakarta busway management company failed to furnish bus companies in the network with clear contracts to ensure standards were met and maintained.

PT Jakarta Ekspress Trans (operating corridor 1, Blok M-Kota) and PT Trans Batavia operating (corridors 2 and 3) have both been given contracts but without clear arrangements for rewards or penalties.

Unlike the system the Jakarta busway is based on, in Bogota, Colombia, Transjakarta has yet to implement a minimum daily kilometer (payment) arrangement for its bus companies. The present payment structure is fixed only when a fuel price increase occurs.

Jakarta busway operators are paid based on the total number of kilometers traveled, regardless of the time buses spend stuck in traffic jams at intersections (often because other vehicles have been allowed to use the exclusive lanes).

"We experienced a price hike on spare parts last year but have yet to receive a payment adjustment for this," PT Jakarta Ekspress Trans personnel and finance director Ibnu Susanto said.

The contracts also do not mention rewards or punishments for bus companies not adhering to minimum service standards.

Companies operating corridors 4 to 7, PT Jakarta Mega Trans and PT Jakarta Trans Metropolitan, do not have permanent contracts yet despite operating for one year.

"We've conducted our service based on a letter from the administration," PT Jakarta Mega Trans (operating corridors 5 and 7) operational director Gani Kamaludin said.

The letter simply states Transjakarta would pay some Rp 12,885 per operational kilometer, without elaborating on how this figure was met.

PT Jakarta Trans Metropolitan (serving corridors 4 and 6) operational director I Gde Bagus Oka, said his company did not benefit under present conditions. He said it had faced growing inefficiency with increased traffic jams since the opening of the exclusive lanes, and long waiting times at CNG filling stations.

"We understand the administration wanted to build the network as quickly as possible, but in the long run of course we are looking for a more secure arrangement," he said.

The administration only built two CNG stations on Jl. Daan Mogot in West Jakarta and Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan in East Jakarta. These are supposed to serve 238 gas-fueled buses in corridors 2 to 7, meaning buses spend up to two hours just to refuel.

Buses needing to refuel during the day have resulted in waiting times well beyond the targeted maximum 10 minutes.

Various studies showed passenger waiting times were anywhere between 5 and 60 minutes at busway shelters.

Transjakarta head Dradjad Adhyaksa attributed the poor service record to a "limited" budget and "high" overhead.

Transjakarta needed to cut its operating costs by reducing busway services outside peak hours, Dradjad said.

"I will not say we work inefficiently or ineffectively. This is the best service we can provide on such a limited budget," he said.

Transjakarta gets its revenue from ticket sales and government subsidies. Last year some 25 percent of the company's Rp 174.52 billion operating cost came from subsidies.

The four new corridors that opened this year, however, increased Transjakarta's dependency on government funding. Approximately 54 percent of its estimated Rp 433 billion running cost came from the city budget. Dradjad said Transjakarta would spend 72 percent of its operating costs on bus companies alone.

The poor service and failure to produce conducive contracts were largely beyond Transjakarta's control, Dradjad said.

"We have service standards for operators … but we cannot enforce them because there are too many conditions beyond our control," he said.

Dradjad said Transjakarta did not have any power in the decision making process, for example, in the current mixed traffic arrangement or the limited number of gas refilling stations.

He said the poor service was due to tardy procurement of extra buses by two companies within the network; Jakarta Mega Trans and Jakarta Trans Metropolitan.

Transjakarta opened corridors 4 to 7 in January 2007, with only eight buses operational. A contract between Transjakarta and the corridor's two bus companies stated that the latter would provide 129 buses by January. Because of the shortfall, buses from other corridors were sent to the four new corridors.

Dradjad declined to say why Transjakarta had insisted on opening the corridors.

"We just try and do what we are told. It is not in my capacity to say whether the services were premature or not," Dradjad said.

 

Tags: , ,
Permalink • Print • Comment